Play Ball With the Feds on Illegal Immigration? Beacon Hill Democrats Say …

Printed from:

By Katie Lannan

STATE HOUSE — A shared interest in preserving public safety fueled the arguments made Monday for and against legislation that would prohibit the use of state resources to enforce immigration law through certain types of partnerships between state and federal agencies.

Testifying before the Judiciary Committee during an at-time heated hearing, backers of state Representative Antonio Cabral’s bill to prohibit the use of state resources for so-called 287(g) agreements — which delegate Immigration and Customs Enforcement authority to officers at the state or local level — said the deals can leave immigrants afraid of local police and reluctant to come forward if they need help.

“There are a lot of people who sit in fear in their homes just being afraid to see or be seen by a local law enforcement official, and these kind of 287(g) agreements are making this fear substantive, and that kind of fear is deadly,” said Dr. Lara Jirmanus, a physician testifying on behalf of the Greater Boston Health and Law Immigrant Solidarity Network. “That very kind of fear, fear of local police collaboration with immigration enforcement, translates into fear of all public institutions and is gripping our neighborhoods, clinics, schools, and hospitals at this very moment.”

In Massachusetts, the sheriffs of Bristol and Plymouth counties and the state Department of Correction have signed such agreements, though their officers have not yet received the training necessary to carry them out. Bristol County Sheriff Thomas Hodgson has been a vocal critic of the bill (H 3033), along with another filed by Cabral that would restrict the use of inmate labor on out-of-state projects (H 3034).

Bristol County Sheriff Thomas Hodgson watched from the front row as state Representative Antonio Cabral approached to testify before the Judiciary Committee on Monday.[ Photo Gallery: Sam Doran/SHNS]


Hodgson in January proposed the idea of sending inmates to help build President Donald Trump’s proposed wall along the border with Mexico as part of a broader project to contribute to infrastructure and disaster relief projects.

Hodgson told the committee the delegated immigration enforcement authority would only apply to his correction officers within the jail and that his staff “does not go around rounding people up.” He said passing Cabral’s bill would restrict the ability of various levels of law enforcement to work together.

“If you didn’t learn anything after 9/11, and apparently a lot of these people didn’t, it was that we needed to strengthen our partnerships with one another in law enforcement to make sure we have every possible tool in our toolbox to keep people safe,” Hodgson told reporters during a break in the hours-long hearing. “That’s our charge, that’s the charge of our Legislature, and I expect that the people in this community, this state, as well as states across the country, the majority of them get it.”

Hodgson made national news in March when he told a Congressional subcommittee that local officials in “sanctuary” municipalities that don’t cooperate with federal immigration enforcement should be arrested, and criticized Brockton state Representative Michelle DuBois’s Facebook post warning of a potential ICE raid in her city.

DuBois testified in support of Cabral’s legislation, saying restricting 287(g) agreements would still allow other partnerships between local and federal officials.

“We shouldn’t mix the two,” she said. “It’s like making a firefighter a police officer as well.”

Cabral, a New Bedford Democrat, said the main issue driving his bills is his belief that administration of federal programs is not an appropriate use of state dollars.

“This is not a debate about immigration here,” he said. “This is about state dollars, and state dollars ought to be used for state programs. Period.”

The bills, however, have become a part of the discussion around how Beacon Hill should address federal immigration policies. A working group of senior House Democrats convened by Speaker Robert DeLeo to guide the body’s response to Trump threw its support last month behind both of Cabral’s bills.

Representative Denise Provost, a Somerville Democrat, told the Judiciary Committee that although 287(g) agreements have existed for years, there has been a “different tenor” around immigration under Trump, creating a “heightened level of concern.”

“I think that there is real concern about the lawlessness which has been introduced into immigration policy under the current administration that has resulted in many lawsuits, applications for injunctive relief,” she said. “I think that kind of a sentiment at the top gets communicated down through the ranks.”

Carlos Hernandez, a Saugus Republican who says he is exploring a run against U.S. Representative Seth Moulton, told the committee that state government “must start protecting the American citizens and the legal residents, and the legal permanent residents in Massachusetts.” He referred to the presence of the international gang MS-13 in parts of the state.

“They should be working with ICE,” he said of local law enforcement. “They should be working with federal government to uphold the law. How many people have to die, Americans, citizens and permanent residents, have to die?”

Hodgson said the safety of a community “isn’t measured in dollars and cents” and cautioned that it may be measured “in grieving families” if the bill passes.

Several supporters of the bill made financial arguments against using state resources for federal partnerships.

“At a time of significant challenges in balancing the state budget, I believe it is not appropriate to use scarce state funds to enforce federal immigration laws, for which federal authorities should be responsible,” Senate President Stanley Rosenberg wrote to the Judiciary Committee on Monday.

Asked about his stance on Cabral’s bills Monday afternoon, DeLeo said he thinks “there’s going to be some room for discussion for that legislation.”

Governor Charlie Baker said he would prefer to see inmate labor used on projects within Massachusetts and that he believes it is important for state and local law enforcement “to do what we can to make sure we get violent, dangerous criminals off our street.”

“I don’t think, frankly, there’s disagreement around that question when it comes to detainers and to ICE, and as long as the conversation’s about that, I think that’s one we should support,” Baker told reporters.

Representative Antonio Cabral of New Bedford answered questions from Representative James Lyons of Andover during Monday’s Judiciary Committee hearing. [Photo: Sam Doran/SHNS]
Sheriff Thomas Hodgson testified Monday before the Judiciary Committee.[Photo: Sam Doran/SHNS]